|
CHAPTER XXXIV.
Aquileja and Grado
History of the two Patriarchal Cities
Aquileia was founded by the Romans in the year 182 B.C.
(1) as a
frontier fortress against the Istrian barbarians, and its name is
said to be derived from the eagle whose appearance was hailed by the
colonists as a good omen. The Via Aemilia, by which the
Via Flaminia
was continued from Ariminum through Cisalpine Gaul to Mediolanum,
was afterwards extended by a branch from Mediolanum through Bixia
Verona and Patavium to
Aquileia and Tergeste, whence in after-times
another road, the
Via Egnatia, was carried the whole length of
Dalmatia to Dyrrhachium.
In the year 169 B.C. the Aquileians sent envoys to Rome to beg
that the number of the colonists should be increased, and by a
decree of the Senate fifteen hundred families were enrolled and sent
there under the command of triumviri (2). Thus strengthened and
enlarged
Aquileia rapidly rose to
[378] the position of one of the strongest and proudest of Roman towns.
Its population numbered 600,000, it was the emporium for the
Illyrian trade, it possessed a manufactory of purple dye, and
contained a college of artizans which included twenty-five
corporations of various handicrafts. The city was a favourite
residence of the Empress Livia, who is said to have attributed her
long life among other causes to the healthfulness of its now
fever-stricken shores, and it was the birthplace of the only child
born to Tiberius by his wife Julia (3), the daughter of Augustus.
Though during the security of a long peace her walls had fallen
into decay, the city was enabled by the courage of her citizens to
resist the attacks of the usurper Maximin in 238; but in 452 Roman
Aquileia perished in flames at the hands of
Attila and his
victorious hordes, and in the time of Justinian in the next century
scarcely a vestige remained of what had been 'one of the richest,
the most populous, and the strongest of the maritime cities of the
Adriatic coast.' The refugees from the ruined cities of
Aquileia,
Altinum, Concordia and Patavium peopled the remote and almost
inaccessible islands of the lagunes that surround the head of the
Adriatic from Grado to Venice and Chioggia, and the savage destroyer
undesignedly laid 'the foundation of a republic which revived in
the feudal state [379] of Europe the art and spirit of commercial industry
(4) '.
Once again were the Aquileians, who had after a humble sort
revived their ancient city, frightened away from their home by a
barbarian irruption. On the Lombard invasion in A.D. 570 Paulinus
the archbishop fled to Grado with his relics and treasures, and the
Arian Lombards entering
Aquileia plundered the church and slew the
priests. Paulinus never returned, but died and was buried at Grado,
or New
Aquileia as it came to be styled while the residence of the
fugitive patriarchs.
The elevation of the metropolitan see of
Aquileia to a
patriarchate was probably connected with the famous dispute
concerning the Three Chapters, which divided the clergy of the
Eastern and Western parts of the empire, and caused the temporary
separation of.
Aquileia and the Istrian bishoprics from the Roman
Church. By raising their metropolitan to the rank of a patriarch (5)
the dissentients from the papacy sought no doubt to mark their
spiritual independence, and also to give greater weight and dignity
to their party. The
Three Chapters were the writings of the three divines, Theodore
of [380] Mopsuestia, Theodoret of Cyrrhus, and Ibas of Edessa, which though
approved by the fourth
œcumenical Council at Chalcedon in 451, were
by the influence of Justinian convicted of Nestorian heresy and
condemned by the fifth
œcumenical Council at Constantinople in 553; from which it may be observed, says Mosheim, that 'councils as
well as doctors differ.' The Eastern Church dutifully bowed to the
will of Justinian; the pope Vigilius was terrified into consent,
and his successor Pelaodus I adhered to the sentence of the Council
of Constantinople, as his successors have since done. But the
influence of the chair of St. Peter did not suffice to bring the
Western bishops to accept a decision which they considered injurious
to the credit of the Council of Chalcedon, and the metropolitan
church of
Aquileia with the suffragan bishops of Istria remained
independent of the Church of Rome till the schism was finally healed
in 698 (6).
The patriarch Paulinus was succeeded in 571 by Probinus, and he
by Helias, a Greek, who governed the church of Grado or New
Aquileia
till 586, the title of patriarch being formally transferred to the
new 'cathedra.' Helias followed the schismatical or in other words
the less numerous party which preferred the ruling of the Council of
Chalcedon to that of its successor. The letters of Pope Pelagius II
and the threats of the exarch Smaragdus were alike fruitless, and
although according to Muratori and other writers the heretical
patriarch [381] recanted, and was reconciled to the Roman see before his death,
this is denied and disproved by other authorities (7).
His successor Severus persevered in the same steps, and is also
reckoned by the Church of Rome as a schismatic. After his death in
606 the diocese of
Aquileia was divided into two parts. The Lombard counts of
Aquileia being then more tolerant of Catholic churchmen than their
ancestors had been, the clergy of
Aquileia chose John for their
patriarch, while the clergy of Grado chose Candidianus, and thus two
patriarchal seats arose side by side, that of
Aquileia, schismatic,
protected by the Lombards, and that of Grado, orthodox, protected by
the exarch of Ravenna. The original suffragans of Grado were the
bishops of Malamocco (Methamaucus), of whom the series came to an
end in 1105, Equilium, which was destroyed by the Hungarians in 903,
Venice, Torcello, and Chioggia (Fossae Clodiae) (8).
In the growing strength of Venice, one of her spiritual
dependents, the church of Grado found a protector when the exarchate
finally failed her. In [382] 933 she was protected by the
Venetians against the marquis Winter of Istria, who had stripped her
of her possessions at Pola and elsewhere in that province, and in
944 (9) against Lupo, patriarch of
Aquileja, who was repulsed by the
doge Pietro Candiano III, and bound by a treaty, to which the clergy
and nobility of
Aquileja put their hands, not to enter the territory
of Grado under a penalty of fifty pounds of gold (10). The rival
patriarch was ever the most dangerous foe Grado had to fear: he
never ceased his pretensions to both spiritual and temporal
authority over her, and lost no occasion of asserting his claims by
force of arms even in defiance of the papal confirmation of her
patriarchal rank in 967.
The great doge Pietro Orseolo II in the year 992 undertook the
restoration of Grado from the injuries inflicted by time and the
hand of man. He rebuilt or repaired the walls and raised towers for
its better defence, and he built a palace (11), whither he loved to
retire from the cares of state and enjoy the society of the
patriarch Vitale Candiano. Grado was the first halting-place of the
great fleet which sailed from Venice under his command on Ascension
Day, 998, to encounter and subdue the Narentines, and win for the
Republic the sovereignty of the Adriatic. The patriarch received the
doge with great ceremony, conducted him to the duomo, and by way of
[383] giving a religious sanction to the enterprise, placed in his hand
the victorious standard of S. Hermacoras.
The patriarchs of
Aquileja had by this time become great secular
princes of the empire as well as great ecclesiastical dignitaries.
They reached the height of their prosperity in 1027, when the
patriarch Poppo obtained from the emperor Conrad II complete
exemption from all feudal imposts, which was followed by the
liberation of the patriarchal territory from the control of the
dukes of Carinthia. The rival patriarchate of Grado at his very door
was a constant offence to this powerful prince-bishop, and the
political disturbances then agitating Venice gave him the
opportunity he desired of humiliating her. In 1026 the doge Ottone
Orseolo was an exile in Istria, and his brother Orso, patriarch of
Grado, had fled with him. Under pretext of administrating the
diocese of the absent patriarch Poppo advanced to Grado with an
armed force. The citizens stood on the defensive and prepared to
oppose his landing, but he calmed their fears by swearing to abstain
from all hostile attempts on the city, and was allowed to enter it
without opposition. No sooner, however, was he within the city than
his followers began to profane the churches and outrage the
ministers. Altars were thrown down, the sacred virgins were
violated, the priests slain, the bones of the dead were dug up, the
churches and houses were plundered, all the relics that could be
found were appropriated and [384] carried off, and the island was left in charge of a garrison of
Aquilejan soldiers.
Anxious to prevent ecclesiastical censure, Poppo sent an embassy
to Borne to plead with Pope John XIX for the restoration of the
ancient rights of the see of
Aquileja over the island of Grado, of
which he complained it had long been unlawfully deprived. The Pope
ignorant of his excesses listened and consented, and a bull was
issued to reinstate him in the ancient rights to which he pretended.
The new doge, Pietro Centranico, however, sent a fleet to Grado
which drove the Aquilejans away, and he recalled the absent
patriarch Orso Orseolo, who in dismay at finding his church sacked
and his patriarchal authority extinguished sent to Borne to
undeceive the Pope, prove the antiquity and authority of his
patriarchal seat, and expose the sacrilege of Poppo.
The Pope learned that he had been duped; to have successfully
deceived infallibility was scandalous, and it was now Poppo's turn
to incur the denunciation of the Church. A fresh bull was fulminated
by which the former one was reversed; Poppo was condemned, and it
was decreed that no one for ever should presume to disturb Orso and
his successors in their functions or possessions as patriarchs of
Grado (12).
[385] Poppo however continued to enjoy his ill-gotten gains. It is
said, though it is scarcely credible, that the spoils of Grado were
enough to enable him to rebuild his cathedral at
Aquileja, to adorn
it with a lofty tower, to renew the town walls on a grander scale,
and still to leave him a handsome surplus. But even this did not
satisfy him, for again in 1044 he made a fresh attack on Grado,
relying on the support of the party of the antipope Sylvester III,
to whose side he had attached himself, and he again sacked the town,
slew the priests, and burned what he could not carry away. He was
summoned to Rome to render an account of his ill deeds, but died
suddenly before he could reply to the summons, passing away without
either confession or viaticum (13). The pope proceeded to enact the
restitution to the patriarchate of Grado of all its rights and
possessions, and the long list of the latter seems almost to confirm
the high estimate of the spoils on which Poppo laid his hands;
'videlicet ut omnia quae in
[386] Rivo alto, in Methamauco, in Equilio, in Pineto, in Civitate
nova, in conjinio suae jam dictae civitatis Gradensis, seu Ursiano
vel Gajazo, in Zemulis, partim in territorio Aquilejae et in marino
termino, in Istria, in Tergeste, Justinopoli, Pirano, item in
Civitate nova, Parentio, Pola, atque in Castello Sei Giorgii et
reliquis locis tarn infra qnam extra seu in Bononia vel Romania,
Ravenna, Arimino, Pesauro, sive in quibuscunque locis Italici regni
seu Venetiae habere ac possidere,' &c, &c.
The patriarch of Grado was thus established securely in his
dignity and emoluments, but the town of Grado never recovered the
havoc of Poppo's double invasion; and from that time it steadily
declined till it became what we now see it, a mere village on a
desolate island, with nothing but the ancient basilica to mark its
former ecclesiastical importance as the seat of the Venetian
primate.
Patriarch Domenico Marengo in 1045 desired to quit Grado on
account of its miserable condition; the next Patriarch Dom° Cervoni
was reduced to such straits that Gregory VII wrote to beg the doge
to supply his needs; and the succeeding patriarchs, Giov. Gradenigo
(1105-1131) and Enrico Dandolo (1131-1186), actually moved their
residence to Venice. Henceforward the patriarch was a stranger to
his titular city; he had a palace at Venice, and took precedence as
the first citizen of the Republic; his authority was recognised over
all the islands of the Lagunes, while that of
Aquileja
[387] prevailed over the churches of Friuli and Istria
(14); and in 1145
the patriarchal rule of Grado was extended over the new metropolitan
see of Zara with its suffragan bishoprics (15). This revolution gave
great dissatisfaction to the Zaratini, and was one cause of their
first revolt against the Venetian government (16). In the year 1450 the
seat of the patriarchate was formally transferred from Grado to
Venice, where it has survived to the present day.
The rival and older patriarchate of
Aquileja has not been so
fortunate; its secular greatness involved it in constant struggles
with its neighbours, and the final fall of its temporal power
dragged down with it the spiritual office in one common ruin.
In 1238 the seat of the patriarchate was transferred by Berthold
von Andeechs from
Aquileja to
Udine, so that here too as at Grado
the titular cathedral city was no longer the episcopal residence. It
was in the time of this patriarch that the marquisate of Istria was
finally attached to the patriarchate, which thus acquired sovereign
rights over the western Litorale and a large part of Istria. The
[388] spiritual dignity of the patriarchal see was as jealously
defended as its secular possessions. In 1245 at the Council of Lyons
the Aquilejan patriarch claimed an equal throne with the patiiarchs
of Antioch and Constantinople who attended with the Latin emperor
Baldwin II, and though on the remonstrance of the two Eastern
prelates the seat of this modern pretender was thrown down, the Pope
afterwards allowed it to be re-erected.
The gradual transference of the Istrian dominion to Venice and
Austria has been traced in the foregoing sketch of Istrian history.
The patriarchal possessions in Friuli were swallowed up by the
neighbouring poAvers at a later date. The territory of Udine Avas
annexed by Venice in 1420, the patriarchal city of
Aquileja alone
being left to the Prince-bishop, and in 1544 the remainder of his
temporal sovereignty AAras finally taken from him by Austria. The
patriarch seems to have employed the spiritual power which
remained to him in fomenting discord between his two despoilers,
and as his metropolitan jurisdiction extended on both sides of the
frontier he had considerable opportunities for mischief. In order to
stop this source of dispute an agreement was arrived at between
the republic and the empress Maria Theresa in the year 1751, by
which the patriarchate was finally extinguished. As a
preliminary step a vicar apostolic was appointed in 1750 for that
part of the patriarchal diocese which was situated within the
Austrian territory, and the administration of the estates of the
[389] chapter of
Aquileja was transferred to the political authority.
In the next year 1751 the patriarchate itself was finally
suppressed, and in its stead were created two archbishoprics at
Udine and Gorizia, the former with jurisdiction over the Venetian
part of the old diocese including Venetian Istria, and the latter
over the Austrian part including the sees of Trieste Pedena Trento
and also that of Como in Lombardy. A medal was struck to commemorate
the event, with the following inscription: —
QVOD INTER, STATVS AVSTR • ET VENET
• DISSIDIA FOVIT PATRIARCH
•
AQYILEIENSI IN METROPOLES GORICENS • ET VDIN
• MVTATO SEDENTE
BENEDICTO XIV IMPERANTIB • FRANC • ET M • T • AVGG SVBLATVM PAX
SVBDITIS REDDITA MDCCLI. (17)
|
In 1818 the see of Udine was reduced to a bishopric, and the sees
of Capodistria,
Cittanova,
Parenzo, and
Pola, which had been made
suffragan to it in 1751, were transferred again to the metropolitan
of Venice, the successor of the patriarchs of Grado and ancient
metropolitans of Istria.
To understand the piquant phenomenon of two [390] patriarchates at
Aquileja and Grado within ten miles of one
another, it is necessary to remember on one hand the theological
question of the Aquileian schism in which the two patriarchs took
opposite sides, and on the other the antagonism of Eastern and
Western Europe in the sixth and seventh centuries, whose interests
met and clashed on the debateable ground at the head of the
Adriatic. While the Lombards and after them the Franks were
establishing; themselves in Friuli the Venetians continued to
profess themselves servants of the 'king of the Romans' reigning at
Constantinople. The Aquilejan patriarchs therefore were prelates of
the Lombard kingdom and afterwards of the new Western empire, while
their rivals at Grado were subject to the Byzantine emperors. For
instance, we read of an appointment to a bishopric in Venice being
made by the Emperor Nicephorus in 802 which John the patriarch of
Grado was required to confirm. And afterwards when the Venetians
grew strong enough to dispense with the shadowy support of Byzantine
protection, they continued on political grounds to maintain most
jealously the dignity of their patriarch, and endeavoured to
strengthen their hold on them provinces by centralizing in him the
ecclesiastical government of their dominion. By subjecting to his
authority the bishops of their Dalmatian conquests they sought to
detach them from their old allegiance to the see of Spalato, a place
which was then in possession of the rival power of Hungary, and to
teach their Dalmatian subjects to look [391] to Venice as the seat of spiritual as well as of political
government. This policy, though it at first drove the Zaratini into
rebellion, may possibly have had greater political effect in the
other direction than has been admitted by Dalmatian writers. |
Notes:
- The colonies of Mutina and Parma were
established in the same year, Liv. xxxix. c. 55.
- Liv. xliii. c. i 7.
- Suetonius, Vit. Tiberii, c. 7.
Pliny mentions
Aquileia, though
it is difficult to understand how he makes it out to be twelve miles
from the sen, Plin. iii. 18.
- The story of the siege and
capture of
Aquileia is known to every reader of
Gibbon. Vid. Decl. and Fall, ch. xxxv. Dandolo, 1. v. c. 1, pars
xii., says that Grado was founded at this time by fugitive
nobles from
Aquileia who in litore castrum
spectabile construxerunt. It had, however, no doubt been an
outpost of
Aquileia in Roman times.
- Padre de Rubeis,
Dissertazione sulla scisma d'
Aquileia, Sec, quoted by Bertoli.
- The details of this dispute will be found in Gibbon and
Mosheim.
- Bertoli, Antichità di
Aquileja, quotes Muratori, who in his
list of patriarchs places the death of Helias in 582.
- Eitelberger, Mittelalterliche Denkmale, &c. The Venetian
writers claim higher antiquity for the patriarchate of Grado, on
the ground that the cathedra was transferred from Old to New
Aquileja, and that consequently the second patriarchate of Old
Aquileja was a new creation. The Abbot Joachim in his book on
Ezekiel, according to Dandolo, finds prototypes of these two
patriarchates in Zara and Phares, the twin sons of Judah, of whom
the elder signified prophetically the Church of Grado, and the
younger that of
Aquileja. Dandolo, 1. vi. c. 1, pars xvii.
- Or 942.(?}.
- Vol. Misc. relating to Graclo in Bibl. Marciana, Venice, No.
258, to which I am largely indebted for the following history.
- Dandolo, 1. ix. c. r, pars iv.
- Cod. MS. Trevisan, Decision of Pope John XIX. The pope learns
that Poppo 'quicquid in ecclesia inventum est unca manu depraedatum
est, duorum monasteriorum sanctimoniales stupratae
ac violatae a suis sunt, neque monachis pepercit.
Quin etiain defunctorum corpora quietem desiderantia a propriis
tumulis auferens ad civitatem suam inhonorata transtulit, reliqua
minus tamen quam desiderabat similiter secum devexit, altaria
confregit, thesauros abstulit...' Worst of all he fraudulently
claimed aucient rights over Grado. The former bull is revoked, and
it is enacted that no one 'praedictum Ursonem patriarcham ac
successores ejus de praedicto patriarchatu Gradensi sive de rebus
ac possessionibus ejus iuquietare aut molestare praesumat,' &c.
Vol. Misc. Bibl. Marc. 258.
-
'Sed antequam a nobis de tanto eververato(?)
ausu divino judicio sine confessione et viatico ab hac luce
subtractus est.' Decret. Sinod. of Benedict IX.
-
The sees suffragan to
Aquileja in 1132 were
sixteen;
Pola,
Trieste,
Parenzo,
Pedena,
Cittanova,
Concordia,
Treviso, Ceneda, Belluno, Feltre, Padua, Vicenza, Trient, Mantua,
Verona, Como. Gams, Ser. Episc.
-
'Tandem Lampridius iste Jadrensis episcopus
effectus est. Iste primus sub patriarca Gradensi pallium obtinuit ab
Anastasio Papa anno Domini MCXLV.' Thorn. Archid. c. xx.
-
See vol. i. p. 47-50.
- Scussa, Storia Cronografica di Trieste. Continued by
Kandler,
ed. Cameroni, Trieste, 1863. As the last twenty patriarchs from
1465-1751 were all Venetians of the five families Barbò (1),
Barbarò (4), Donati (1), Grirnani (7), Giustiniani (1), Gradenigo
(3), and Dolfin (3), the grievance may be assumed to have been felt
principally by the Austrians.
|
Main
Menu
Created: Sunday, January 10, 2016;
Last Updated:
Wednesday, November 17, 2021
Copyright © 1998-2025
IstriaNet.org, USA
|
|